alienspacecentereast's blog

Nuke heading for Los Angeles shot down by aliens?

Posted in Mysteries by alienspacecentereast on November 13, 2010

Nuke heading for Los Angeles shot down by aliens? – the story about the mystery missile and spectacular contrail over the Pacific, heading for Los Angeles monday evening on november 8th 2010 at 5:30 p.m., was said by some to be just a plane, by others a missile launch or anti-missile laserweapon test and now a new theory are growing – a nuke bound for LA that was shot down and stopped by Pleidian aliens

NEW BOOK 2010
UFOs - Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record
Find more books at
Amazon.com

The more down-to-earth and ongoing theory, says it was just an airplane, but when it comes to the hard facts, no one knows exactly what it was. US military (DoD), FAA, NORAD and US Airways can´t confirm 100% it was a plane. And then it starts to be really creepy, because videos of the supposed airplane contrail have the profile of a rocket, not an airplane. And it was heading for Los Angeles, following the same path as Flight 808, that did depart Honolulu at 9:53 a.m. and arrived at Phoenix at 7:04 p.m., which puts that plane over LAX area around 5:51 p.m., around 36 minutes before KCBS-TV cameraman Gil Leyvas noticed the growing contrail at 5:15 p.m. Also consider Flight UPS902
So, it´s easy for people to conclude, that this contrail must have been from flight 808. Exactly 24 hours after the mystery missile contrail-event, a new contrail did appear exactly same place again and this time it was by an airplane. Based on that information, we can conclude, that no matter if the contrail was created by a missile or an airplane, it was heading towards Los Angeles…

CBS footage shows a rocket and a flash / explosion, not an airplane…

Some experts are saying, that the supposed rocket contrail was an illusion and that it was too slow to be a rocket, but when we talk about illusions, a missile heading towards you would seem to move very slowly or actually seems to stand still for a while, and first when it closes in on you and passes directly over head, you can see and sense the speed of it. Then I looked the CBS footage through, I noticed, that there was a sparkling light or fire in the top of this massive contrail, and exactly that looked like a rocket launch. The mystery just continues to grow then a big flash or explosion appears on the top of the contrail (where the missile or airplane should be), like it was hit by something. And it get much more weird when you realize the medias cut the clips or zoom out fast, exactly where the flash appears. Why cut in the middle of an apparent dramatic event? See the videos Mystery Missile No Airplane Contrail and Mystery Missile Flash & Explosion for more on that.

Before the flash


The big flash

via AFP/Getty Images, U.S. Department of Defense

A successful test with airborne anti-missile laser weapons was carried out february 2010 (photo) in California. The plane uses a combination of lasers to lock on to the missile and track its trajectory, and then bring it down with a ­single shot fired from the nose turret, all in less than 12 seconds.

Also tests with a ground-based system called “Laser Weapon System” (LaWS) has been carried out with success. Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) announced Juny 3th 2010, that LaWS had tracked, engaged and destroyed a drone in flight, during an over-the-water engagement in California.

ICBM heading for Los Angeles?

The target-theory, that a missile was launched and they were testing new anti-missile laser technology and shot a missile down with lasers, is one of the best theories I can think of, but then ask me why US military (DoD) does seem to look like idiots and can´t tell nothing about this incident? Was it a black budget secret missile test? Well, if it was, why launch it where millions of people can see it and why send that thing towards Los Angeles? It may be difficult for them to explain anything at all, when a missile is heading for Los Angeles.
So they won´t say or won´t clarify anything. It´s best to keep their mouth shut in this sensitive case, where a missile with a dummy warhead maybe, was heading towards LA.
One exception was NORAD, that stated ”there were no threat to the nation” and ”the contrail was not the result of a foreign military launching a missile”. How can they say this if they don´t know what it is? I think their statement in it self reveals they knows something, but it is maybe too embarrassing to reveal to the public, or simply too hot to handle…

Chinese military submarines

Could it be Chinese military submarines that are involved and actually came through the US defense and fired a dummy nuke, just to show they can do that? If they can “pop up” in the middle of a U.S. Naval exercise in the Pacific ocean, without being noticed at all, they can easily move into position in US waters and launch a dummy warhead too.
A 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier Kitty Hawk, a 1000 feet aircraft carrier with 4500 personnel on board, that was part of the Naval exercise in the Pacific ocean, between Japan and Taiwan 3 years ago (reported november 10th 2007).

Chinese "Song Class" Attack Submarine

Bonewashed by aliens

I just can´t stop thinking about what is really going on here. Back in september 14th 2010, massive put options was bought on the S&P 500 Index. That kind of activity also happend weeks before 9/11, indicating that someone knew a market nieche would crash. And now while Obama is out of town with 34 warships and a hole army, a missile is heading for LA? Let´s hope this really was a secret anti-missile laserweapon test, and not that someone just attempted to wipe out LA (and got bonewashed by aliens, who shot down the missile)…

That Pleidian aliens shot down a nuke heading for LA is a wild theory that is difficult for me to swallow, but the alien presence is real, trust me. The lady in the video below, Colleen Thomas, claims to be a Pleiadian contact. She says the US government was firing an ICBM at Iran and was intercepted by the Pleidian aliens…

NEWEST DVD RELEASES
UFOs - The Pleiadian Connection 2 DVD Set (Classic Edition)
Find more DVDs at
UFOTV.com

Well, Colleen Thomas´s message is one of these “messages” I will put back in my mind and just let stay there for later dissimination, if something related comes up as pieces to the big puzzle. I am very open-minded but have difficulties in believing her story.

But the case about the Nuke guards, that claims aliens had fingers on their buttons since 1960´s, is an amzing story backed up by many credible witnesses. These people made us aware that UFOs are visiting nuke missile bases and has happend to dismantle the nukes. This is not only happening in United States, but also Russia, and it´s getting kind of weird when you hear about the incident in Russia, where the opposite happenend, and they got their nukes activated instead of deactivated. For 15 seconds, russian nukes was set to “prepare to launch” while a 900-foot-wide UFO was hovering over their missile base. That event occurred on October 5, 1982 near Khmelitskiy in the Ukraine and was revealed in a Russian UFO Research based on 13-year study of UFO-reports, read more here and here. You might also be interested in reading this post, a very good in-depth read about other UFO Missile events, among them the latest story about the 50 minuteman ICBMs At Warren AFB, that got temporarily offline October 23, 2010, at Warren AFB near Cheyenne, Wyoming.

HOT NEW BOOK 2010
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites
Find more books at
Amazon.com

There has been many UFO sightings caught by both mainstream TV news networks and by ordinary people around the world, so it´s becomming too foolish not to take this phenomenon serious. We got the chinese airport UFO incident, were several passenger jets were diverted and delayed. Since Juny this year, China have had 11 UFO incidents. While China is visited by aliens, also New York had it´s UFO Sighting on the same day on october 13th 2010, as a robot-like UFO hover over a Californian airforce base. It is not worth mentioning the Texas UFOs on october 15th 2010, because they were apparently night skydivers with magnesium flares. But now again, a fireball or Ghost Rocket, was seen in the sky over New York on november 10th, only two days after the missile contrail event on november 8th 2010 – see here: Did You See The Fire In The NYC Sky? (CBS New York).

New development November 15th 2010

General Mcinerney: “I am absolutely certain that is not an aircraft”

What authorities and experts are saying about the mystery contrail

The Department of Defense

The Department of Defense said november 10th, that it was satisfied the event was likely caused by an airplane. They have no information to suggest this was anything other than a contrail caused by an aircraft, said Pentagon spokesman Col. David Lapan. Lapan would not get into any details what data sources other than the CBS news tape they have looked into, but said that evidence helped determine this was most likely an aircraft. It was the response from all other government agencies saying they did not launch anything that convinced them this was likely an aircraft. Still no hard facts here.

US Airways

Spokesman for US Airways, Todd Lehmacher, could not confirm that Flight 808 was responsible for the vapor trail, though he did confirm details of flight 808, that did depart Honolulu at 9:53 a.m. yesterday morning local Honolulu time and arrived at Phoenix at 7:04 p.m. The plane did travel along the planned route between those two destinations, but that isn’t conclusive evidence, Lehmacher stated.

FAA (Federal Aviation Administration)

Spokesman for the FAA, Ian Gregor, agreed with Lehmacher’s diagnosis, that “we can’t determine the exact source of the contrail because we don’t know its location, trajectory or altitude”. Remember, “we did a radar replay of an area based on media reports of the location of the contrail, not on any precise location of the contrail.”

Former ambassador to NATO Robert Ellsworth

Robert Ellsworth, former ambassador to NATO, said the rocket possibly was an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). Ellsworth says perhaps it was fired as a “show of force,” related to President Obama’s Asia trip, and from what he tell, it looks like it’s a “test firing from an underwater submarine to demonstrate, mainly to Asia, that we can do that…”

Jane’s Missiles and Rockets

The editor of Jane’s Missiles and Rockets, Doug Richardson, examined the video for the Times of London and said he was left with little doubt and he stated that it was a solid propellant missile. You can tell from the efflux (smoke) and it could have been a ballistic missile launched from a submarine or an interceptor, the defensive anti-missile weapon used by Navy surface ships, he said.

US Navy retired Captain

Captain Joe DeNigro, retired from US Navy, said on Wednesday nov. 10th to CBS, that he had no doubt it was a missile – “the only thing I´ve ever seen do that, is a missile”, he said.

Chief of naval operations

Adm. Gary Roughead, chief of naval operations, told reporters and editors at The Washington Post that it “wasn’t a Navy missile.” He declined to go into more detail. He did, however, appear to be smiling when he said it.

Defense and aerospace expert

John Pike, a defense and aerospace expert who runs GlobalSecurity.org said, that “this thing is so obviously an airplane contrail, and yet apparently all the king’s horses and all the king’s men can’t find someone to stand up and say it.” He added, “I guess the president’s out of town.”

NASA Director of research

Al Bowers, associate director of research at NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center in the Mojave Desert , supports the theory, that it was an airplane contrail distorted by camera angle, winds and other environmental factors including a setting sun, was independently supported by

NASA senior research scientist

Patrick Minnis, a senior research scientist at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Virginia, who studies remote sensing of the atmosphere and Earth’s surface, stated about the controversial contrail, that a missile would look like that and that it could potentially have a contrail that shape. But the motion looks a little suspect to me, and my conclusion would be that it is most probably an aircraft. At Langley Research Center, Minnis and colleague Doug Spangenberg analyzed a sequence of infrared images of the area collected between 5 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. Monday by GOES-11, a geostationary operational environmental satellite. At 5:30 p.m., they spotted a contrail extending horizontally from the left side of the image, that bends toward the (northeast) pointing directly at Catalina Island. Minnis said, that the contrail had to have started 15 to 45 minutes earlier and become quite wide to be visible to the satellite, he said.

Wayne Madsen

Washington, DC-based independent investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, claims in his exclusive report to his subcribers of November 10 and to Alex Jones show, that the “mystery missile” fired 35 miles off the coast of Los Angeles, was in fact an ICBM fired by a Chinese Jin class nuclear submarine. The Chinese Navy Jin class ballistic missile nuclear submarine, deployed secretly from its underground home base on the south coast of Hainan island, launched an intercontinental ballistic missile from international waters off the southern California coast. Beijing meant it as a show of force to warn the United States.

    Also see:

 

Mystery Missile no Airplane Contrail, most likely a ICBM Launch

Posted in Mysteries by alienspacecentereast on November 11, 2010

Mystery missile was no Airplane contrail but most likely an ICBM test launch – in my humble opinion, I think it was some kind of InterContinental Ballistic Missile test, launched from a military submarine or military ship. One theory is, that it was launched unintentionally, but consider all the sercurity levels you have to go through, following a protocol strictly, before you can “punch wrong buttons”. It simply outrules the whoops-theory. I think it was an intentionally test launch of a substantial missile, maybe an InterContinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) of some type. We have all seen NASA´s shuttle launches and numerous other cargorocket liftups, and we know how they look like in the sky, you know, the sparkled fire leaving a thick contrail in the sky. I have never seen an airplane sparkle like this craft does, that I strongly believe is a missile, see video below…

Former US Deputy Secretary of Defence Robert Ellsworth told it was a pretty big missile but not a Tomahawk cruise missile. He also aired his opinion about, that it could be a test firing of an intercontinental ballistic missile from a submarine, to demonstrate to Asia that United States can do that. Other speculations are, that it could be a target, which was launched to test anti-missile lasers, which are currently being developed and do get tested in the Pacific.

In the videos above and below, you can see a flash and I wonder why all the videos I have seen so far, don´t show anything about this flash? They cut or zoom out fast when the flash appears. It´s like you stop the movie when it is most exiting. If I was video editor working for Sky2 or CBS8, I would focus on the sequences where the explosion-like flash appears. You know, where some dramatic event unfolds.

You see in one sequence Sky2 cuts the clip just as the flash appears and in another sequence, they zoom out just then the flash appears. CBS8 choose to wait just after the flash (see clip 4 in the video above) and precise that flash looks like an explosion to me. You may have noticed, that the contrail stops at a certain point and we see no more sparkling light, fire in the sky or flashes. The theory it could be a target, which was launched to test anti-missile lasers, could be a very good explanation – the missile was for target practise and they shot it down with lasers? See the video below for slowmotion footage…

New development November 15th 2010

    Also see: